1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 225 Or.
  5. 225 Or. 614 (1960)
 

SUITTER v. THOMPSON ET UX

225 Or. 614 (1960)

358 P.2d 267

SUITTER v. THOMPSON ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 29, 1960.

Petition for rehearing denied January 31, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Banta, Baker, argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents. On the briefs were Banta, Silven, Horton & Young, Baker.

O. Daniel Dearborn, Jr., Ontario, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Gallagher & Galey, Ontario.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and KING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment. It was stipulated by the parties that the interests of the defendants National Industrial Products Corporation, a corporation, The Amalgamated Sugar Company, a corporation, and Del Dewey and Edward Dewey, were not affected by this suit, and they had no interest in its outcome.

The record discloses that the defendants Ivan Thompson and Mary Thompson are husband and wife

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases