1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 186 Cal.App.2d
  5. 186 Cal.App.2d 651 (1960)
 

HOOPER v. BYRON JACKSON PUMPS, INC.

Docket No. 24521.

186 Cal.App.2d 651 (1960)

9 Cal. Rptr. 273

EVELYN HOOPER, Appellant, v. BYRON JACKSON PUMPS, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

November 23, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger J. Pryor and Pauline Day Bakst for Appellant.

Dryden, Harrington, Horgan & Swartz and Robert A. Klein for Respondents.

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

The issue on this appeal is quite simple: Did the trial court err in reading to the jury sections 525.1 and 551 of the Vehicle Code? The facts of the case did not bring those sections into play, and we have concluded that, in this particular case, the error in giving the instructions was prejudicial.

[1] Before dealing with the question of the instructions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases