1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 188 F.Supp.
  5. 188 F.Supp. 641 (1960)
 

PEER v. CLAREMONT

Civ. No. 9730.

188 F.Supp. 641 (1960)

Ruth E. PEER, Plaintiff, v. Albert E. CLAREMONT, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. BENTON COUNTY, OREGON, a municipal corporation, Third-party Defendant.

United States District Court D. Oregon.

January 8, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Koerner Young, McColloch & Dezendorf, Wm. J. Moshofsky, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Hart, Spencer, McCulloch, Rockwood & Davies, Cleveland C. Corey, Portland, Or., John B. Fenner, Corvallis, Or., for defendants.

KILKENNY, District Judge.

The principal question to be decided in this case is the validity of a tax foreclosure proceeding prosecuted by Benton County, Oregon, in a proceeding which was commenced on March 23, 1939.

On August 4, 1927, a patent was issued from the United States to one William C. Stumberg, describing the following property in said Benton County:

"Lot 1 and the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 3 in Township eleven...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases