CREE v. TANNICH ET AL


220 Or. 606 (1960)

349 P.2d 1094

CREE v. TANNICH ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded March 9, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Burt, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Robin D. Day, Salem.

A.L. Lewelling, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Lewelling & Gies, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, O'CONNELL and HOLMAN, Justices.


REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HOLMAN, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is an action for damages for personal injuries brought by the plaintiff, Cree, a pedestrian, against the defendants, Tannich and Bren, who were operators of a motor vehicle. This trial was the second one involving the same circumstances, it having been tried previously before another judge, which previous trial had resulted in a judgment of involuntary nonsuit which was not appealed. A judgment of involuntary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases