1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 220 Or.
  5. 220 Or. 573 (1960)
 

SHOEMAKER v. SELNES ET AL

220 Or. 573 (1960)

349 P.2d 473

SHOEMAKER v. SELNES ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 10, 1960.

Petition for rehearing denied March 8, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.W. PicKell, Salem, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.

T.W. Churchill, Salem, and Manley B. Strayer, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief were E.L. Crawford, Salem, R.H. Huntington and Hart, Rockwood, Davies, Biggs & Strayer, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, O'CONNELL and HARRIS, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is an action for malicious prosecution. After the plaintiff rested his case, the court sustained the motions of defendants Arnold Selnes, Jens Svinth, and G. Carroll Meeks for judgment of involuntary nonsuit. The court also sustained the motion of defendant The United States National Bank of Portland for a directed verdict in its favor after the latter had rested its case without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases