DINKINS v. BOOE

No. 389.

114 S.E.2d 672 (1960)

252 N.C. 731

William Robert DINKINS, Jr. v. Bobby BOOE and Fred Travis Driver.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter Zachary, Yadkinville, R. Lewis Alexander, Elkin, Hudson, Ferrell, Carter, Petree & Stockton, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff appellee.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, H. Grady Barnhill, Jr., Winston-Salem, F. D. B. Harding, Yadkinville, for defendants appellants.


WINBORNE, Chief Justice.

Careful consideration of the record and case on appeal in case in hand fails to reveal prejudicial error.

Appellant Fred Driver's exceptions 1, 2, 8, and 19, and appellant Booe's exceptions 2, 4, and 13 are expressly abandoned by appellants. Fred Driver's exceptions 9 and 18 are taken as abandoned, no reason or argument having been stated nor authorities cited in support of the assignments based upon them. Harmon v. Harmon,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases