1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 56 Wn.2d
  5. 56 Wn.2d 729 (1960)
 

STATE v. DAVIS

No. 34940.

56 Wn.2d 729 (1960)

355 P.2d 344

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RICHARD DAVIS, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

September 15, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor Haglund and Max Kosher, for appellant.

Walter J. Deierlein, Jr., and Stanley K. Bruhn, for respondent.

HILL, J.

This appeal highlights the distinction between a suspended sentence under RCW 9.92.060, which we will refer to as the Suspended Sentence Act, and under the provisions made in the Prison Terms, Paroles and Probation Act, which we will refer to herein as the Probation Act (RCW 9.95.200 through 9.95.250).

Generally speaking, our superior courts use the former when they desire to suspend the execution of a sentence during the good behavior of a convicted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases