1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 157 A.2d
  5. 157 A.2d 626 (1960)
 

ARNOLD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos. 2466 and 2467.

157 A.2d 626 (1960)

Emanuel M. ARNOLD, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided February 2, 1960.

Rehearing Denied February 17, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark P. Friedlander, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mark P. Friedlander and Blaine P. Friedlander, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of "colliding" and of "leaving after colliding" in violation of the Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations.

His contention on this appeal is that the court improperly limited his counsel in his cross-examination of the government's witnesses.

We have carefully examined the record and cannot say there was any abuse of discretion in this connection.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases