1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 359 Mich.
  5. 359 Mich. 392 (1960)
 

HAMMEL v. FOOR

Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 48,241.

359 Mich. 392 (1960)

102 N.W.2d 196

HAMMEL v. FOOR.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 11, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold J. Egloff, for plaintiffs.

Derrick C. Eaton, for defendants Dupraw and Krapohl.

KAVANAGH, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill for specific performance of 2 alleged oral contracts. They claimed to be the beneficiaries of an oral contract between Albert Dupraw and Caroline Dupraw, his wife, both deceased, to make mutual and reciprocal wills giving their property to each other and then 1/2 to specified heirs of each. They further claimed as beneficiaries of an oral contract by Albert Dupraw to leave property to the plaintiffs by will in exchange for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases