Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
The complaint is based on a conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of her property rights after her husband's affections already had been alienated. There is no allegation that the moving defendants aided and abetted in that alienation. Therefore, the action is not barred by section 61-a of the Civil Practice Act. (Ruza v. Ruza,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.