CITY OF HILLSDALE v. HILLSDALE IRON & M. CO.

Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 47,150.

358 Mich. 377 (1960)

100 N.W.2d 467

CITY OF HILLSDALE v. HILLSDALE IRON & METAL COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided January 4, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey W. Moes, for plaintiff City of Hillsdale.

Dimmers, MacRitchie & Moes (Albert W. Dimmers, of counsel), for individual plaintiffs.

Kenneth W. Huggett, of counsel for plaintiffs.

Butzel, Levin, Winston & Quint, for defendant.


DETHMERS, C.J.

Defendant appeals from decree restraining it from operating its scrap yard in a residential zone in plaintiff city in a manner held to constitute an extension of a permitted nonconforming use and a nuisance. We affirm. The individual plaintiffs occupy neighboring residences.

Defendant's first main contention is that the zoning ordinance in question is, as applied to its property, unreasonable and unconstitutional for a number of reasons, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases