1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 356 P.2d
  5. 356 P.2d 370 (1960)
 

ROBERTS v. HUMPHREYS

No. 38833.

356 P.2d 370 (1960)

Maude I. ROBERTS, formerly Maude I. Teeter, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fleeta Teeter HUMPHREYS and George Howard Teeter, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 25, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilson, Wilson & Massad, Frederick, for plaintiff in error.

Arthur A. Kelly, Frederick, for defendants in error.

BERRY, Justice.

In this action, plaintiff in error, Maude I. Roberts, hereafter referred to as "plaintiff", seeks to cancel a warranty deed under date of July 28, 1958, by the provisions of which she purported to convey to defendants in error, Fleeta Teeter Humphreys, hereafter referred to as "Fleeta", and George Howard Teeter, hereafter referred to as "George", fee simple title to a 160-acre farm lying in Tillman County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases