RICHARDSON v. MESSINA

Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 47,940.

361 Mich. 364 (1960)

105 N.W.2d 153

RICHARDSON v. MESSINA.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided September 16, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moll, Desenberg, Purdy & Glover, for plaintiffs.

Sanborn & Monks, for defendants.


SMITH, J.

The action before us is brought at law upon a conditional sales promissory note. Plaintiffs were not holders in due course thereof, the note being in default upon their acquisition thereof,* and are subject to the defenses of absence or failure of consideration, in whole or in part, should such be established. The defense asserted is rescission for breach of warranty of fitness.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases