GUINAN v. TROTTA


28 Misc.2d 695 (1960)

Elizabeth Guinan, Appellant, v. Emanuele Trotta et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 1, 1960


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Scheer for appellant. Hallam M. Richardson and John J. Howley for respondents.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The order of the Supreme Court was predicated on procedure only, not on the merits of plaintiff's application. She was relegated to a plenary action, and therefore the court below erred in considering the order of the Supreme Court as res judicata to this action.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs to plaintiff, and motion denied.

Judgment and order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases