1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 274 F.2d
  5. 274 F.2d 448 (1960)
 

LUSTIG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 16415.

274 F.2d 448 (1960)

Paul LUSTIG, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Halina LUSTIG, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles B. E. Freeman, Hart H. Spiegel, Harry Baum, Lee A. Jackson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Halina Lustig, Paul Lustig, in pro. per.

Before BONE, POPE and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We think that the findings of fact of the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous, and since we are in full accord with the statement of the law expressed in the decision of the Tax Court which is reported at 30 T.C. 926, the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

We cannot agree with the contention of the petitioner Lustig that the rule laid down in Thomas Lovett, 18 T.C. 477, is not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases