MATTER OF PLOTINSKY v. GARDNER


27 Misc.2d 681 (1960)

In the Matter of Bertha Plotinsky, Petitioner, v. John J. Gardner et al., Constituting the Board of Appeals on Zoning of the City of New Rochelle, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Westchester County.

August 6, 1960


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Moroze for petitioner. Murray C. Fuerst, Corporation Counsel, for respondents.


HUGH S. COYLE, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, instituted by petitioner, an aggrieved party, who owns and resides in a private residence situated diagonally opposite the property in question, to review and annul the determination and decision made by respondents, granting a special permit and variance to Sigmund and Mildred Ordinsky to construct a gasoline service station...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases