COVEN v. COVEN


64 N.J. Super. 6 (1960)

165 A.2d 200

NATHANIEL B. COVEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GEISHA COVEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 14, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max Schomer argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Nathaniel B. Coven, respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, HANEMAN and FOLEY.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment nisi awarding plaintiff a divorce on the ground of adultery, and from the dismissal of her counterclaim for separate maintenance. It is contended that (1) the trial court erroneously concluded that an act of adultery was committed since it based its decision entirely on the uncorroborated testimony of plaintiff; (2) the trial court erred in finding that defendant's failure to call the corespondent as a witness could...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases