FELTON, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff contends that a verdict was demanded in his favor under the rule in Tifton Chevrolet Co. v. Mathis, 44 Ga.App. 839 (163 S. E. 308) and Dasher v. Williams, 30 Ga.App. 122 (117 S. E. 108). There was no rescission of the contract as a matter of the law under the Mathis case, supra, for the reason that the evidence was conflicting as to whether the plaintiff made a tender of the September 7th instalment. The court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
