1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 55 Wn.2d
  5. 55 Wn.2d 639 (1960)
 

STONEMAN v. WICK CONSTR. CO.

No. 34921.

55 Wn.2d 639 (1960)

349 P.2d 215

W. GLENN STONEMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. WICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Respondents, STERLING OF AURORA, INC., Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

February 11, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Montgomery, Montgomery & Purdue and John D. Blankinship, for appellant.

Hullin, Ehrlichman, Carroll & Roberts (John A. Roberts, Jr., of counsel) and Elliott, Lee, Carney & Thomas (Elvin P. Carney, of counsel), for respondent Wick Construction Company.

Venables, Ballinger & Clark, for respondent Isaacson Iron Works.

ROSELLINI, J.

This case is before the court upon the findings of fact, which have not been challenged. Briefly, they show that the appellant intervener, Sterling of Aurora, Inc., leased certain property abutting Aurora avenue, in Seattle, from W. Glenn Stoneman, under an agreement whereby Stoneman would construct a retaining wall and fill. Stoneman submitted his proposed plan to the firm of Shannon & Wilson, engineers and soil experts, who advised him that soil...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases