1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 224 Or.
  5. 224 Or. 470 (1960)
 

WOCHNICK v. TRUE ET UX

224 Or. 470 (1960)

356 P.2d 515

WOCHNICK v. TRUE ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed November 9, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederic P. Roehr, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Vergeer & Samuels, and Charles S. Crookham, Portland.

Reinhart & Coblens, Portland, filed a brief for respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN and HOLMAN, Justices.

REVERSED.

HOLMAN, J. (Pro Tempore)

Plaintiff, Iva Wochnick, was the owner of an equity in a hotel at Seaside. The defendants True had previously been the owners of a jewelry business in Portland which had been operated by Mrs. True. The Trues sold the business to one Rothstein and took in return a note for the sum of $18,000, payable in monthly installments and secured by what purported to be a chattel mortgage on the fixtures and stock of goods of the business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases