The ordinances provide for reconstructing and resurfacing certain streets and for constructing and reconstructing certain sewers, and provide for a tax to be levied upon all taxable property in the city to pay therefor. Plaintiffs contend that all three ordinances are illegal because they are in violation of the city charter, which, plaintiffs contend, requires that part of the cost of the improvements be assessed against the adjacent properties benefiting therefrom. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
