1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 189 F.Supp.
  5. 189 F.Supp. 500 (1960)
 

EISENBERG v. COMMERCIAL UNION ASSURANCE COMPANY

189 F.Supp. 500 (1960)

Max EISENBERG, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCIAL UNION ASSURANCE COMPANY Limited, North British Group, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 19, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, New York City, for plaintiff; Joseph J. Moscou, New York City, of counsel.

Edward F. Sweeney, New York City, for defendant.

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Defendant moves for dismissal of this action on the ground that there is no diversity of citizenship between plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff is a citizen of New York. Defendant is a British corporation with its principal place of business in London. Defendant has many places of business in the United States but its principal one in the United States is in New York.

The question presented involves the interpretation of section 1332...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases