FRANKUM, Judge.
1. Where, as in the instant case, an assignment of error is to the trial court's direction of a verdict as being "contrary to law" without a further averment that there were questions of fact which should have been submitted to a jury, the assignment is insufficient to raise a question for determination before this court. Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 (171 S. E. 293); Chandler v. Pennington,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
