UNITED STATES v. DURHAM

Cr. A. No. 1107-59.

181 F.Supp. 503 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Homer DURHAM, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

February 26, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Harold H. Titus, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for United States.

George A. Schmiedigen, Washington, D. C., for defendant.


HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The defendant moves for an opportunity to inspect the Probation Officer's report of the presentence investigation. This motion is denied.

It is not the practice to permit the defendant or his counsel or any one else to inspect reports of presentence investigations. Such reports are treated as confidential documents. They are not public records. The reason is obvious. Such reports, in order to be helpful to the Court, must of necessity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases