McBRIDE v. FITZPATRICK ET AL


224 Or. 457 (1960)

356 P.2d 947

McBRIDE v. FITZPATRICK ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified November 9, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Tilbury, Portland, argued the cause and submitted a brief for appellants.

Robert C. Wall and Carlton Reiter, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Stern, Reiter, Day & Anderson and Robert C. Wall.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and MILLARD, Justices.


AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is a suit brought by a partner against his co-partner and others for the rescission of a partnership dissolution agreement and for an accounting. Defendants appeal from a decree for the plaintiff. Plaintiff cross-appeals.

On September 4, 1954, plaintiff McBride and defendant Paul Fitzpatrick entered into a partnership for the purpose of conducting an automobile sales...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases