KRUCENSKI v. LORENZO


21 Misc.2d 652 (1960)

Joseph L. Krucenski, Respondent, v. Vic Lorenzo, Doing Business as Vic's Collision Service, Appellant.

County Court, Niagara County.

February 1, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Levine & Loncto for appellant.

Hovey & Kushner for respondent.


FRANK J. KRONENBERG, J.

The judgment of the Niagara Falls City Court is affirmed.

This case, involving $40, presented to the trial court the question (which, as noted in Langlois v. Langlois, 5 A.D.2d 75, has "little rational basis") whether a settlement of a claim was an executory accord or a novation.

Plaintiff was dissatisfied with repair work done by defendant on plaintiff's automobile. He...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases