1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 280 F.2d
  5. 280 F.2d 392 (1960)
 

UNITED STATES v. LLAMAS

No. 352, Docket 26121.

280 F.2d 392 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Francisco Diaz LLAMAS and Jose Rodriguez, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided July 11, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicholas Atlas, New York City, for defendant-appellant Francisco Diaz Llamas.

Saul Roth, New York City, submits for defendant-appellant Jose Rodriguez on the brief of defendant-appellant Francisco Diaz Llamas.

Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U. S. Atty., E. D. N. Y., Brooklyn, N. Y. (Judith A. Gelb, Confidential Asst. to the U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Llamas and Rodriguez appeal from their convictions of selling and conspiring to sell narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 371. Although sharply contested, there was ample testimony from federal narcotics agents to support the jury finding that defendants sold narcotics to one of the agents. Hence the appeal must fail unless there were errors in the trial. The

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases