STIMSON LBR. v. LAURENCE-DAVID, INC.


224 Or. 447 (1960)

356 P.2d 84

STIMSON LUMBER COMPANY v. LAURENCE-DAVID, INC., ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 12, 1960.

Petition for rehearing denied November 9, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Pierre Kolisch, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Ramsey and Kolisch, Portland.

Hugh Barzee and Moe M. Tonkon, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the briefs were Barzee, Leedy & Lind and with Moe M. Tonkon was Philip A. Levin, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and KING, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

KING, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Multnomah county denying the plaintiff's claim for injunction and damages for alleged infringement on and use of trade secrets and formula for making plastic wood used in the plywood industry.

The plaintiff in 1939 employed a chemist named Luback for the purpose of developing a wood plastic material which could be used for patching and repairing cracks, worm holes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases