RUSSO v. SANTINI

No. 3749.

22 Pa. D. & C. 2d 647 (1960)

Russo v. Santini

Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.

May 4, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foglietta, Ocks & Fisher, for plaintiff.

H. M. Schell, for defendants.


CHUDOFF, J., May 4, 1960.

This case raises the question of whether a judgment may be confessed by an attorney on a copy of a note, the original, containing a power of attorney to confess judgment, having been lost, stolen or misplaced.

Although defendants' petition to strike the judgment, to which plaintiff has filed an answer, alleges facts denying the execution of the instrument, it has been stipulated by and between counsel for plaintiff

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases