SPRUNG v. HALBERSTAM


28 Misc.2d 636 (1960)

Ruth A. Sprung, as Administratrix of The Estate of Jack N. Sprung, Deceased, Appellant, v. Joseph Halberstam, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 8, 1960


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Meisnere for appellant. Cohen, Friedman, Goldstein & Raphael (Jack Goldstein of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Issues were presented in respect of the alleged payment by defendant and whether or not there was in fact an accord and satisfaction. Moreover, the prohibition of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act applies to evidence in affidavits on a motion for summary judgment as well as to testimony upon a trial (Ditkoff v. Prudential Sav. Bank, 245 App. Div. 748). But it has been held that on a motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases