1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 29 Misc.2d
  5. 29 Misc.2d 632 (1960)
 

UTICA MUT. INS. v. MANCINI & SONS

29 Misc.2d 632 (1960)

Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Paul Mancini & Sons (Mancini Brothers), Defendant.

Supreme Court, Oneida County.

June 3, 1960

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubbard, Felt & Fuller for defendant. Tucker & Bisselle (William Evans, III, of counsel), for plaintiff.

JOHN H. FARNHAM, J.

This is a motion for an order dismissing the amended complaint upon the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This cause was assigned to plaintiff by operation of section 29 of the Workmen's Compensation Law for reimbursement to it for compensation moneys heretofore awarded and paid by plaintiff to one John Hitchens...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases