HARTLEY v. TACOMA SCHOOL DIST.

No. 35299.

56 Wn.2d 600 (1960)

354 P.2d 897

MARY A. HARTLEY, Respondent, v. TACOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10, Defendant, THE CITY OF TACOMA, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

August 18, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall McCormick and Robert R. Hamilton, for appellant.

Albert & Andrews, for respondent.


ROSELLINI, J.

The respondent was injured when she fell on an ice- and snow-covered sidewalk, owned by the appellant city, which crossed property of the defendant school district. The latter was dismissed from the resultant action and is not a party to this appeal, which is taken from a verdict in favor of the respondent.

No error is assigned to the instructions, but the appellant contends that the evidence was such that a verdict in its favor should have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases