ACKLEY v. NASHUA

No. 4825.

102 N.H. 551 (1960)

EUGENE R. ACKLEY & a. v. NASHUA & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided July 19, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clancy & O'Neill (Mr. O'Neill orally), for the plaintiffs.

Leo R. Lesieur for the defendant city of Nashua.

Harkaway & Ryan (Mr. Ryan orally), for the defendant George J. Pappademas.


KENISON, C. J.

We first consider the following question transferred without ruling: "Does said Article IX, Section 45-A (5) [of the zoning ordinance of the city of Nashua] include in its meaning of the words `variance' and `use variance' an extension of an existing non-conforming use as applied for in this case?" That provision of the zoning ordinance reads as follows: "Any application for a variance in the use of land or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases