1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 60 N.J.
  5. 60 N.J. Super. 582 (1960)
 

GOETSCH v. PHILHOWER

60 N.J. Super. 582 (1960)

160 A.2d 60

WILLIAM GOETSCH, MARY PILART AND PAUL DIAMOND, PLAINTIFFS, v. HAROLD W. PHILHOWER, TOWN CLERK OF IRVINGTON, NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 5, 1960.

Opinion April 8, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin Kesselhaut argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. George S. Hochberg, attorney for respondents, appeared at the request of the court, but did not argue.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a Law Division judgment, entered March 22, 1960, holding void the petition nominating defendant Huhn for Democratic county committeeman in the 1st ward, 16th district, Irvington, N.J., and directing that his name not be placed on the sample ballot or official ballot for the primary election to take place April 19, 1960. We scheduled oral argument as an emergency in view of the necessity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases