1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 12 Wis.2d
  5. 12 Wis.2d 52 (1960)
 

JOLITZ v. GRAFF

12 Wis.2d 52 (1960)

JOLITZ and others, Respondents, v. GRAFF and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 29, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, attorneys, and Clayton R. Hahn of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Hahn.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Daniel D. Sobel of Milwaukee.

DIETERICH, J.

The only question before this court is whether or not an extension of time should be granted plaintiffs' attorney to serve the proposed bill of exceptions.

Sec. 270.47, Stats. 1957, provides that a proposed bill of exceptions must be made within ninety days after the service of the notice of entry of judgment.

"TIME FOR SERVICE OF BILL OF EXCEPTIONS. After judgment is perfected either party may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases