McKINLEY v. SLENDERELLA SYSTEMS OF CAMDEN, N.J., INC.


63 N.J. Super. 571 (1960)

165 A.2d 207

DOROTHEA McKINLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SLENDERELLA SYSTEMS OF CAMDEN, N.J., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 4, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. H. Hurlburt Tomlin argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. S.P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and KILKENNY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiff brought a County Court action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained through the negligence of defendant, a reducing salon, while taking its course of "Slenderella" treatments. Defendant's motion for dismissal made at the close of the entire case was held in abeyance by the trial judge for later determination, R.R. 4:51-2; he sent the case to the jury, and it returned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases