1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 225 Or.
  5. 225 Or. 406 (1960)
 

KARN ET UX v. PIDCOCK ET UX

225 Or. 406 (1960)

357 P.2d 509

KARN ET UX v. PIDCOCK ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed December 21, 1960.

Petition for rehearing denied January 17, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William T. Hollen, Newport, argued the cause for the appellants. On the brief was Adams & Hollen, Newport.

Robert A. DeArmond and Elmer M. Amundson, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With Elmer M. Amundson on the brief were DeArmond and Sherman, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and KING, Justices.

REVERSED.

KING, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is an appeal by the defendants Thomas Pidcock and Pearl A. Pidcock, husband and wife, from a decree ordering strict foreclosure of a contract and denying their request for rescission for alleged fraudulent representations.

The defendants Thomas Pidcock and Pearl A. Pidcock were the owners of certain farm and ranch property between Rainier and Clatskanie, Oregon.

The defendants Robert E. Sullivan and Marjorie...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases