LANDIS, J.
Appellant was charged with receiving stolen goods and was convicted after a jury trial and sentenced for a term of one to ten years.
On this appeal appellant first contends the evidence was insufficient to show that the automobile tires here in question, received by appellant, were stolen goods but rather that the same were embezzled property and that the verdict is therefore not sustained by sufficient evidence.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
