MAULL v. CARBESS REALTY


28 Misc.2d 588 (1960)

Alfred Maull, Respondent, v. Carbess Realty, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 15, 1960


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isaac Kaplan and Nathan Steiner for appellants. Donald Crichton for respondent.

AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur; HOFSTADTER, J. P., concurs in result.


Per Curiam.

While the record might well justify a judgment against the individual defendant, the Trial Justice throughout evinced such hostility toward the position of both defendants as to deny to them the fair trial to which they were entitled by law. Moreover, exhibits were erroneously admitted without proper foundation. The result may not stand; the interests of justice require a new trial.

The judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases