KISER v. KISER

38228.

101 Ga. App. 511 (1960)

114 S.E.2d 397

KISER v. KISER.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided April 14, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howe & Murphy, Harold L. Murphy, D. B. Howe, for plaintiff in error.

Murphy & Murphy, Thomas B. Murphy, James R. Murphy, contra.


TOWNSEND, Judge.

1. A motion for a directed verdict is a prerequisite to a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (Code, Ann., § 110-113), and where it appears from the record that no such motion was made, a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict cannot be considered. Durden v. Henderson, 212 Ga. 807 (1) (96 S.E.2d 362). Where, however, it appears from the record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases