1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 9 Wis.2d
  5. 9 Wis.2d 51 (1960)
 

PINDOR v. FAUST

9 Wis.2d 51 (1960)

PINDOR, Appellant, v. FAUST, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 5, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Kersten & McKinnon of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Charles J. Kersten.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by James W. Lane of Milwaukee.

CURRIE, J.

The two issues on this appeal are:

(1) Did the manner, in which the front steps of the defendant's store were constructed, constitute a violation of par. 4 of Order 23.5116 of the state building code promulgated by the Wisconsin industrial commission?

(2) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error with respect to a certain ruling made as to the admissibility of evidence?

Method of Constructing Steps.

The orders of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases