1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 180 F.Supp.
  5. 180 F.Supp. 429 (1960)
 

ARNOLD v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY

Civ. A. Nos. 2650, 2651, 2652.

180 F.Supp. 429 (1960)

John R. ARNOLD et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. James C. BATTS et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. Leonard H. MONTGOMERY et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.

January 19, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter Harwood and Judson Harwood, of Harwood, Breedlove & Mittwede, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

David Keeble, of Hooker, Keeble, Dodson & Harris, Nashville, Tenn., H. G. Breetz, Louisville, Ky., for defendant.

WILLIAM E. MILLER, District Judge.

These actions have been submitted upon plaintiffs' amended complaints and defendants' motions to dismiss. The motions present identical legal questions.

The facts, as disclosed by the amended complaints, the motions to dismiss, and the affidavits filed in support of the motions, are as follows:

Prior to August 14, 1957, plaintiffs were employed by the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway and by the Louisville...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases