1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 184 Cal.App.2d
  5. 184 Cal.App.2d 422 (1960)
 

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO v. BARTOLE

Docket Nos. 18862, 19172.

184 Cal.App.2d 422 (1960)

7 Cal. Rptr. 569

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Respondent, v. MARY BARTOLE et al., Defendants; FREDERIC CONSTANT PREVOST et al., Appellants. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Respondent, v. CASIMIR MONTOURSIS et al., Defendants; WILLIAM J. GINGHER et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 7, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph D. Taylor and Christin & Davis for Appellants.

Keith G. Sorenson, District Attorney, Lyle R. Edson, Chief Civil Deputy District Attorney, and Howard E. Gawthrop, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

QUAYLE, J. pro tem.*

These two actions have been consolidated for disposition on appeal. Plaintiff, County of San Mateo, filed both actions to acquire property in Redwood City by proceedings in eminent domain. Answers denied that the taking was for a public purpose. The cases were consolidated for trial of the special defenses, and on hearing thereof judgments on the pleadings were entered in favor of plaintiff. The cases were then separately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases