1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 26 Misc.2d
  5. 26 Misc.2d 577 (1960)
 

GOLDING v. GOLDING

26 Misc.2d 577 (1960)

Robert Golding et al., on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of David Golding and another, Plaintiffs, v. Harry W. Golding et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

May 10, 1960

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (Simon H. Rifkind, Martin Kleinbard and Arthur B. Frommer of counsel), for defendants. Goldstein & Goldstein (Eli B. Levy and Lawrence Kovalsky of counsel), for plaintiffs.

CHARLES A. LORETO, J.

The individual defendants move for an order pursuant to rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice requiring plaintiffs to make their complaint more definite and certain and to set forth whether the claimed agreements were oral or written, pursuant to rule 103 for an order striking out paragraph 26 of the complaint, and further for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to rule 106 (subds. 2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases