RIBAC v. S & G PARTS MFG. & EQUIP. CORP.


24 Misc.2d 36 (1960)

Albert Ribac, Plaintiff, v. S & G Parts Manufacturing & Equipment Corp. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

May 5, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Fogler for defendants. Baer, Marks, Friedman, Berliner & Klein for plaintiff.


MILES F. McDONALD, J.

Motion by the defendant Henry Gaffney for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice dismissing the complaint herein against him on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that the complaint against him does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, granted, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 20 days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases