1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 55 Wn.2d
  5. 55 Wn.2d 540 (1960)
 

FARDIG v. REYNOLDS

No. 34994.

55 Wn.2d 540 (1960)

348 P.2d 661

JULIUS FARDIG, Appellant, v. WILLIAM REYNOLDS et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

January 28, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miracle, Treadwell & Pruzan and Hoof, Shucklin & Harris, for appellant.

Bayley, Fite, Westberg & Madden and Hullin, Ehrlichman, Carroll & Roberts, for respondents.

DONWORTH, J.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the tort feasors, Reynolds and Castagno, were the agents of either respondents Sparling, Inc., and Fauschald Sales, Inc., and/or of respondent Mountain Tree Farm Company by virtue of certain logging contracts (described below), so that any or all of these respondents are liable for the negligent acts of Reynolds and Castagno.

Appellant instituted this action against Reynolds and Castagno, partners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases