1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 32 N.J.
  5. 32 N.J. 27 (1960)
 

CALLAHAN v. DEARBORN DEVELOPMENTS, INC.

32 N.J. 27 (1960)

158 A.2d 830

EUGENE CALLAHAN, JR., AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MARY CALLAHAN, AND MARY CALLAHAN AND EUGENE CALLAHAN, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DEARBORN DEVELOPMENTS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 21, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John W. Leyden, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Leyden & Monaghan, attorneys).

Mr. George A. Brown argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs in this matter and, after considering the proof in the most favorable light to the plaintiffs, have concluded that the judgment should be affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. We limit the affirmance, however, to a determination that the evidence submitted failed to make out a case within conditions (a) and (b) of Section 339 of the Restatement, Torts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases