PITTEL v. RUBIN BROS. BERGEN INC.


59 N.J. Super. 531 (1960)

158 A.2d 210

STEPHEN PITTEL, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MORRIS PITTEL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. RUBIN BROS. BERGEN INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 28, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Solomon Golat argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Talisman and Golat, attorneys).

Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for respondent-respondent.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.


PER CURIAM.

The Essex County Court affirmed a denial of workmen's compensation in an opinion by Judge Lyons to the following effect:

"On this appeal the petitioner questions the Workmen's Compensation Division's dismissal of his claim for disability arising from an assault and battery committed upon him for entirely personal reasons by someone foreign to the employment.

The story of the events constituting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases