1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 222 Md.
  5. 222 Md. 361 (1960)
 

DOUGHTY v. BAYNE

[No. 201, September Term, 1959.]

222 Md. 361 (1960)

160 A.2d 609

DOUGHTY v. BAYNE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 12, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee W. Bolte, with whom was John L. Sanford, Jr., on the brief, for the appellant.

Walter C. Anderson, with whom were Webb & Travers and Simpkins & Simpkins on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question here is whether or not certain statements made by the defendant-appellant, John E. Doughty, were sufficient to permit a jury to find that he had acknowledged a debt which otherwise would have been barred by the Statute of Limitations. The plaintiff-appellee, Clarence E. Bayne, brought suit in the Circuit Court for Worcester County upon a note allegedly made by Doughty. The case was removed for trial to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases