HALL v. WORK


223 Or. 347 (1960)

354 P.2d 837

HALL v. WORK

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reargued April 14, 1960.

Affirmed as modified August 10, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Levenson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Norman B. Kobin and Robert Lohman, Portland.

Wm. J. Masters, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Masters and Masters, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and DUNCAN, Justices.


AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

McALLISTER, C.J.

This is an action by plaintiff, Harry H. Hall, against the defendant, A.M. Work, doing business as Billingsley Motors, to recover both compensatory and punitive damages for the conversion of an automobile and certain personal effects therein. After both parties had rested the defendant moved the court to withdraw from the jury the issue of punitive damages. The court was of the opinion that the motion should be allowed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases